Don't Worry Bout It!

Oh the problem of these four little words. When I hear them I cringe. I have heard these words all too often in Court. They are usually spoken by some lawyer to their client. As in, "don't worry about ... your legal status (non-citizen), your out of state license privileges, your future ability to find employment, your ability to get a professional license, your ability to travel to Canada, etc. etc.

You have to anticipate Collateral Consequences of anything. Everything (every decision) has far reaching and typically long lasting affects. Much like the game of dominoes, once we set a course of events into action, many fall one against the other, and often we cannot even predict when this chain of action will end.

So that said,

1. You have to talk to more than one lawyer about your problem. Get some different perspectives.

2. It is best to talk to a lawyer who specializes in the specific type of problem you are facing.

3. Just because someone has 20, 30, or 40 years of experience does not make him better.

4. Lawyers that use the phrase, "Don't Worry Bout It" should be avoided like the plague.

5. A DWI conviction can affect multiple life areas including your out of state driver's license, your professional licensure, your employability, your permanent record, your ability to travel freely, and your insurance rates and insurability.

As an example of this, I recently had a college student come to me with a first time DWI charge. He held a driver's license from another state. He was attending college in New York State. Since he was planning on staying here for a number of years (establishing residency) for college he should have switched over his license to New York State.

Now he faced a crossroads. Should he switch his license before his initial appearance? Should he get a New York State license? Some lawyers told him, "Don't worry bout it," I told him if I represented him I would investigate the potential DWI conviction ramifications back in his home state. I am a member of the National College of DUI Defense, and have DWI defense friends (on my list serve) as an invaluable resource of information.

The range of consequences in these situations is immense. From fines of $3,000 (ie. New Jersey) to license revocations of 210 days (ie. New Jersey) without conditional (any) driving privileges. So these decisions (much like choosing a lawyer) should not be made or taken lightly. What happens in Colorado, Mass., PA, and the other 43 states varies. But making educated and informed decisions by knowing what happens and saying "don't worry bout it" are two totally different things.

What is DWI "Per Se"?

One of the more challenging things about practicing DWI law is communicating the legal statutes in a way that is clear and understandable to my clients. All 50 states have at least two main types of DWI/DUI offenses. One is called a common law DWI, this is what most people understand or interpret as the "driving while drunk" or "driving while impaired" or "driving under the influence." It has many legal definitions, but in NYS it is mental and physical incapacity to operate (drive) a vehicle as a reasonably prudent (safe, responsible) person.

The other NYS statute is our DWI "per se." PER SE: latin for "by, through, in and of itself, intrinsically, inherently, requiring no external evidence."

If you get one thing from this blog this is it:

You DO NOT have to show the signs or symptoms of intoxication or drunkenness or impairment to be found guilty of this offense.

Merely the fact that a "good" (accurate, reliable, properly administered, calibrated) breath test indicated a BAC (blood alcohol concentration) of .08 or more. Some people like to argue but "I wasn't drunk." It does not matter. But I drove perfectly, it does not matter. But I understood the police officer and did all the tests right, it does not matter. If the state (the government/the prosecutor) can bring in their BTO (breath test operator) and make out (prove):

1. he or she was licensed

2. the machine was properly working

3. the test was properly administered

4. the test was performed within two hours of arrest

then ... the jury may (or may not) find that you are guilty of DWI "per se."

Now a DWI defense attorney can argue the problems with taking indirect measurements of blood through the taking of breath. He can argue that everyone is different even though these machines are calculated and calibrated and set up to test and assess "average" people. He can argue that you, the individual on this given occasion had specific medical issues. He can argue that the test was not properly administered, ie. No 20 minute "observation" period.

I have previously discussed other defenses to breath test results that do not match "sober" behavior patterns. In addition, everything the state proves must be proven to the BRD standard (beyond a reasonable doubt).

I could go on and on, suffice to say, the "science" behind breath testing for alcohol leaves a lot to be desired. Prosecutors and many Judges love to rely upon breath test numbers as godspell. After going through the certification program, and studying these machines I am more than a skeptic concerning their accuracy and reliability. I do not trust breath tests!