You Have Rights? Just Not So Much if You Are a College Violator

I practice in an area of numerous Colleges, Universities, and Schools of higher learning. Beautiful and now cold Ithaca, New York. Go 50 miles in any direction and you will hit pay dirt (lots of little private colleges).

Why do they put all these great schools so far from civilization? Is it the cheap real estate? Just saying...

Anyway, the Isolation sometimes breeds boredom. This Boredom leads to mischief which potentially leads to trouble. Trouble can be in one of two forms (there is a 3rd but I don't do relationship or mental counseling) criminal charges and/or administrative ones. Some schools like TC3 (Tompkins Community College) will suspend you (for a term) for a DWI. Some school police (campus po po) will sometimes file an administrative complaint against you rather than a criminal one.

Is this better?Is this worse? Well it's both.

1. The level of proof to demonstrate your guilt is higher on a criminal charge: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
2. The level of proof to demonstrate your guilt is lower on a campus violation: Preponderance of the evidence (a little bit more likely than not, or 51% to 49% that it is true)

Sometimes it is better to have just a criminal charge, as in possession of marijuana. Then you get Full rights, an attorney, Court, Judge, etc. I once went in to defend my 6th grader, she was accused on putting holes in a cork board (yeah I know a cork board). There I was in front of four teachers and the principal. She was guilty until proven innocent. What BS! It was like the Salem Witch Trials. Apparently she was placing her pencil into prior holes (it was a cork board). I left them a piece of my mind and a short rendition of the constitution. They were unwilling to even consider the possibility that the teacher was mistaken.

 Anyway, criminal charges (a violation) may be better than having to deal with an expensive and emotional draining suspension from school, IMO. Add it up: Dorm, Tuition, loss/waste of time and work. This is definitely not "Priceless."

Remember, Administrative Campus Violations have their own process:

First, an administrative judicial officer hearing. "One on One."
Second, if you would like an appeal to a full hearing, in front of a board. (multiple members)

You can present evidence (witnesses, letters, etc.) at these hearings. You can speak up for yourself, and your conduct.

BTW, at these hearings: NO Lawyers, NO lawyer letters, NO lawyer coaching (at least open and obvious) are allowed.

From the IC book (they are all very similar, I just happen to have their's handy)

 The presence of an attorney and/or written materials submitted by an attorney in representation of his/her student client is prohibited.

What to do? Generally, Do not give up. Defend yourself. Gather evidence. If not of your innocence (maybe you are guilty), then of your character, then of your past success (academically, personally, etc.), teachers/professors can witness to bolster you as an individual, they can also write letters on your behalf.
Take it upon yourself to "Read" your college's rule book on these hearings, fully understand their process/their procedures, and what they allow you.

BTW This is not to be construed as legal advice, every situation is different.

I believe you still have RIGHTS! Any time and any place in the USA. If you are accused of something.

I believe you must Confront your accusers. Confront the accusations. Bring everything into the clear light of day. There is too much to lose to just give up.   

12 Good Reasons Not to Represent Yourself for a New York DWI

I love practicing law in an area filled with many colleges and universities. Ithaca, NY has Ithaca College and Cornell University and my practice focuses on DWI defense within 50 square miles of Ithaca. Over the years I have represented many students and professors who attended SUNY Binghamton, SUNY Cortland, University of Buffalo, Keuka College, TC3, New York Chiropractic College, Syracuse University, etc. The Finger Lakes region also draws people from all over the country for college events and games, recreational activities, and conferences.

In my view, higher education and drinking seem to go together like spaghetti and meatballs. Like it or not people like to drink. I enjoy drinking. There is no law against drinking and driving just driving while impaired or intoxicated. College can be stressful because thinking is the hardest work there is. Writing voluminous papers (often expounding on topics no one cares about), reading (usually very dry material), and taking exams (that play with your mind) is not always fun times.

Alcohol is the most common, legal, and socially acceptable drug we have. Some of my best college memories involved sharing a drink with my friends and fraternity brothers. After having been through many years of college between my undergraduate B.S. in Human Biology, my Chiropractic education, and then law school I have seen the use and misuse of drugs and alcohol. Mr. Mackie may say "drugs are baddd," but I do not believe that drugs or alcohol are bad. They have their place, much like everything else.

I have had a lot of very smart clients. Some with Masters degrees, and Phds in very hard subject areas. They are as a group highly intelligent, motivated, able to research, understand, and apply knowledge at a level beyond the average person.

Which brings me to my burning question of the day,

Should these People represent themselves? In other words proceed, "pro se"?

I will start out by stating a clear and unequivocal NO! and then give you my twelve reasons.

1. If you are embroiled in something personally it is impossible to remain objective. Distance gives perspective, balance, and non emotional (clear) judgment.

2. Most even very intelligent people do not understand the legal system. Even relatively simple Burdens of proof between license issues (administrative) and criminal cases are different.

3. Many Attorneys in 2010 have to specialize and focus in particular areas of law.

The attorney that understands and spends years practicing primarily divorce law will not know how to handle even a speeding ticket let alone DWI charges.

4. Different areas of the country, state, county, city have local rules and customs.

How a Judge, Court, or Prosecutor proceeds with a DWI case in one part of the state may differ greatly by how they handle it in another part of the state. A DWI in Manhattan uses a different breath machine, the Intoxilyzer 8000 versus the Datamaster and Draeger Alcotest (State Police) in Upstate New York.

5. There are usually collateral issues (ie. license) that need to be addressed.

Dealing with the DMV and ALJs (Administrative Law Judges) at DMV hearings is another potential aspect of DWI cases that is overlooked by lay people.

6. There are often pragmatic issues that need to be thought through. How is your case going to affect an out of state license? What are the potential penalties and future ramifications to your specific job or profession?

7. If your case requires hearings, motions, and a trial what then? Are you certified in Field Sobriety testing? Are you familiar with the forensic science behind Breath testing? Have you ever cross examined a police officer? Have you ever presented evidence? Have you ever picked a jury?

8. Would you know what to look for after you obtain the police reports, breath test documents, and other discovery? Have you read many of these? Do you understand police procedures and protocols? Would you be able to pick out problems with the processing of your case?

9. Would you know what was missing from police reports and other documents?

What's not there is as important as what is there. Can you read in between the lines?

10. Is it possible for you to look over one case (your own) in a vacuum and have any insight, perspective, and/or place it on the spectrum in comparison to any other cases? Do you have a firm grasp of current DWI case law? Can you pick out the legal issues and research them? Can you spot any potential defenses?

10. Seasoned attorneys even hire attorneys to represent them and their families.

What legal background or training do you possess? Have you had any prior experience representing anyone legally?

12. Do you believe that the Government prosecutor will negotiate with you fairly, in good faith, and the same way as if you were represented by an attorney?

Do you think you are on even ground when talking with the district attorney? Does he know more about your situation than you do?

It is often said that people who represent themselves have a fool for a client, don't be foolish get the best lawyer you can afford.

Defeating A DWI

I love to surf, the internet that is. Just yesterday I punched in the above terms "defeating a dwi" and what pops up number one but an article by me. At first I was excited, a google number one, then my expression changed as I saw that my name was left off, and admin was put on as the author.

This was a website for a chemical that eliminates odor from your breath. It was being marketed to drinkers who wish to avoid detection as in if you are ever stopped for a traffic infraction just a quick spray and the cops will go away. As I delved further I found more articles sans name. My anger at this internet piracy grew. The articles mentioned the death of my father the day after my 17th birthday, the name of one of my friends, and other personal information. Everything was there except credit to moi! I'm just a little Upstate New York DWI defense lawyer but I do have feelings. Ithaca inspires me to write and share so it is with joy that I create but give a guy credit.

Their site and my articles sans my name and info.

www.sobriety-checkpoint.net

http://www.sobriety-checkpoint.net/category/dwi-sobriety-checkpoints/

http://www.sobriety-checkpoint.net/tag/case/

My original articles:

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/defeating-the-new-york-dwi-refusal-case-1330173.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/the-power-of-words-in-dwi-case-1335602.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/what-do-sex-and-intoxication-have-in-common-1330200.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/defeating-a-new-york-dwi-by-beginning-with-the-end-in-mind-1335399.html

So on that note I wish to highlight the power of "honesty" in defeating a DWI. Some may think me mad in advocating for truthfulness and openness with a criminal case but I have found that not trying to cover up your fears is a better philosophy and strategy for long term success.

Jurors are not stupid. They have the same doubts and concerns as the lawyer looking at the case. If you do not allay their questions openly they will most assuredly be discussing them back in the Jury room.

We as DWI defense lawyers can not look to sweep dirt under rugs and pray that it is never discovered. Everything can be seen from different perspectives. The key with good advocacy is to put yourself in everyone's shoes. Put yourself in the shoes of the juror, put yourself in the shoes of the cop, put yourself in the shoes of the prosecutor, and put your self in the shoes of the judge. Now the case can be seen as a total whole and not a bunch of random pieces or events.

The facts of any DWI case are nothing without context. Someone has to have a viewpoint of that fact.

This is from an actual case. Fact, a driver was pulled over for having headlights that were too bright. The officer in his report made no mention of investigating or asking about the headlights. The motorist only traffic violation was the headlights but no detail or documentation of this fact, just a single ticket plus of course the DWI investigation and subsequent criminal charges.

I demanded a suppression hearing on the stop (was there reasonable suspicion), and the arrest (was there probable cause). My plan of attack was a whole line of questioning, first on the importance of the report and it's detail, then on the fact that my client showed him the dashboard, demonstrated the lights on and lights off controls. The "stop officer" had one goal for this stop (investigate the bright lights) and this sole purpose was never addressed by his investigation/inquiry.

All the DWI criminal charges were dropped. This was with a .15BAC. The outcome was a DWAI (traffic violation) pre-trial. My thoughts for this case were always that jurors would want to know, the judge would want to know THE BIG WHY? If you say the stop was for x why are you not checking x, asking about x, and investigating x?

I was able to listen to my client and get "the story" of this DWI case. His story included the lights where the officer's did not.

btw that Company in California that "borrowed" my content without giving me credit:

Pure One International

3400 West Warner Ave., Unit A

Santa Ana, CA 92704

714-641-1430

fax 714-641-1432

Bytes for All (Website creation/hosting) from someplace overseas.

I really do believe what comes around goes around so God bless them and may they reap the fruits of the seeds they sow.

Lawrence Newman, Esquire

607-229-5184

Ithaca, NY

Dividing and Conquering the DWI

I am a fan of military movies. When I was young I loved to watch John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, and Charles Bronson. They were in my mind men's men. They were walking, talking confident leaders. In my memory, forever type cast as strong, wise, and tough conquerers. They fought for justice, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness.

When I think of my own career arcs, I have always fought or placed myself up against the establishment. When I was a Chiropractor, it was giving my patients the choice of using holistic and natural treatments rather than blindly following one size fits all modern-scientific medical dogma. At other times it was arguing with an insurance company who refused to pay for a procedure or denied benefits. As a lawyer practicing civil law, it was fighting hospitals, medical doctors, and their insurance companies.

Today, practicing DWI defense law, it is the New York State government, law enforcement, and their lawyers (the prosecutors). I am the check to the system. Often I work to set an imbalance. In other words, to create a more level playing field.

One basic premise behind DWI defense is that a case can be won if it is carefully and completely broken down into little pieces. The military theory behind it is called, "Defeat in Detail." You can defeat an enemy more easily by dividing their forces. As Lincoln said, "United we stand, divided we fall." Sun Tzu, said in classic military text, The Art of War, "Fracture the whole."

Any case becomes a story. Every story has chapters. Each chapter has a goal and a purpose. The story is usually of a person at the center of a police investigation.

While they (the government lawyers) are focusing on patterns and signs that focus on drunkenness. I break down the story into the good driving, normal walking, normal talking, normal thinking, normal responding, normal answering, and normal behavior into little bites of tailored information. Each chapter of my story highlights function, and normality. My story focuses on the missing pieces. Their stories embody red, bloodshot, watery eyes, slurred speech, and the strong odor of alcohol. Painting a picture of the fall down drunk. I am looking for all the other reasons (the reasonable doubt) for those same observations.

What is observed are always surface signs. Eyes can look watery at 1:30AM for many reasons, none having to do with the consumption of alcohol. The majority of people are not at their best in the middle of night, and the early morning hours.

So many questions need to be asked. How long have they been studying? How many hours sleep have you had the night before? What is the state of their health? What effect do red and blue flashing lights play in your performance? Or a huge flashlight thrust in your face? Were you nervous, upset, and scared? The term "performance anxiety" ring a bell. How well would anyone do at anything if they forced, under the gun so to speak to perform?

It's all how you look at it. It's the focus. It's the breakdown. It's the details. Make a list right now (while it is still fresh) of everything you did that was good, that was right, that was normal

on the night of your arrest. You will be surprised at how much of what you remember was normal.