DWI Refusal Cases Can be the Better Gamble

I just finished off three DWI refusal cases, as in got them reduced. Reductions BTW are a big deal, especially in criminal law. Many prosecutors do not like reducing charges from level to level. Getting a Felony reduced to a misdemeanor or a misdemeanor reduced to a violation is often the big win.

Now before you glorify me, G-d forbid, there are a great many cases that do not get reduced, there are many cases that I have lost. Nobody wins all their cases. Anyone who says they do is not telling you everything. I have had clients after trial who were found guilty as charged of two DWIs (the common law and the per se). It doesn't feel good, trust me.

But that said, I like the odds, the chances with the Refusal cases. Yeah, no breath, no blood, no measurement!! NO NUMBERS, NO BAC.

The unique opportunity with DWI refusal cases is the administrative refusal hearing. It allows for cross examination of the police officer concerning the legality of the stop and the arrest. It can be a great beginning to gathering the evidence (all the facts) necessary to defending the case against intoxicated driving.

The hearing is for four main areas legally:

DMV Refusal hearing:

VTL 1194 (2) (c) : the hearing is limited to the following issues:

1. did the police officer have reasonable grounds (PC) to believe that such person had been driving in violation of any subdivision of VTL 1192?

2. Did the police officer make a lawful arrest ?

3. was such person given sufficient warning, in clear and unequivocal language, prior to such refusal that such refusal to submit to such chemical test or any portion thereof, would result in the immediate suspension and subsequent revocation of such person’s license or operating privilege whether or not such person is found guilty of the charge for which the arrest was made.

4. did such person refuse to submit to such chemical test or any portion thereof?

Was the refusal persistent?

Imagine a DWI refusal case with a stop for an equipment violation, Now I'm getting really excited, Why you ask?  Now we have a DWI case with no number, no BAC, and with get this... NO DRUNK DRIVING!

Gotta love it, a Drunk case with no drunk driving and no forensic evidence to prove blood alcohol. There are other things to consider but all things being equal, I like the odds better with these cases.

Understanding New York DWI Alcohol Evaluations Part 2

When I practiced as a Chiropractic Physician (before my legal career) I was trained in the use of a psychological manual called the DSM- III (this is now the updated DSM- IV). DSM stands for The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Think of the DSM as "Abnormal Psychology for Dummies" and you have a better picture. This manual allows doctors, psychologists, social workers, addition specialists and a host of other mental health care servers to quickly look up a set of symptoms, patterns, and other behaviors and make a "potential" diagnosis or diagnoses.

As a doctor I needed to differentiate (and sometimes place a rule out diagnosis) between physical illness and psychological illness. Oftentimes patients would have a layer of psychological problems/issues aside from and in addition to their disc or nerve or muscle injury. Now the reason I bring up and explain all of this is because this manual is the "go to" guide for evaluators. As a DWI defense lawyer the manual has new significance for me and my clients.

The manual describes alcohol abuse as ANY "harmful" use of alcohol. Harmful use of alcohol can be further described as any use that causes physical and/or mental damage. We all know that alcohol by it's very nature causes brain cells to die (alcohol blocks oxygen from the brain) so an abuse diagnosis is a very common one.

Legally, Alcohol abuse merely requires education. This can often be in the form of New York State's DMV 7 week Drinking Driver Program (DDP). The Court can force compliance with treatment, rehabilitation, and education related to any plea and/or conviction. In some New York counties this must come before a final case resolution, but in the majority of others it comes as a condition of discharge with the Court (after the final disposition).

The question on everyone's mind is so where is the line between alcohol/drug "abuse" and alcohol/drug "dependence"?

Well generally the following are some of the behaviors that those dependent on alcohol may display:

1. Drinking only one type of alcoholic beverage or preferring one brand.

2. Only going to events, get togethers, and parties that serve alcohol.

3. Being able to drink more and more over time by increasing their tolerance to alcohol.

So far these first three sound like my college days or the behavior patterns of many of us, but please read on,

4. Making a decision to quit drinking and then feeling compelled to drink.

5. Drinking to help a hangover (after a night of intense drinking).

6. A compulsion to drink (feeling you have to drink).

7. Getting shaky and feeling ill if you do not drink (alcohol withdrawl symptoms).

If you become DEPENDENT on alcohol then you should seek help. These last 4 critieria indicate people that have a problem with alcohol.

If we look at what the DSM-IV states we find the following:

If you have (display) 3 of the following 7 symptoms (over the course of a year) you are classified as alcohol dependent. By the way, Alcohol "dependent" is a nice way of saying you have "alcoholism."

-You Neglect activities (giving up on your job, social, and joyful pursuits) because of alcohol,

-You drink Excessively (large quantities over long time periods) beginning drinking early to late,

-You Can not Control your drinking or cut back on drinking,

-You Keep drinking even though it is affecting you mentally, physically, and socially,

-You spend a large majority of time in activities that involve drinking alcohol,

-You get nausea, shakiness, anxiety, and sweating if you do not drink,

-You can really put it away (you have a very high tolerance).

My own personal opinion from helping thousands of people as both a Chiropractor, and as an attorney is those people with drug/alcohol problems usually know it. If they do not deal with it early and own up to it they will eventually be forced by the Court/Legal System to confront their issue with more pain and cost to them and their families in the long run.

To me there is nothing sadder than watching someone throw away their life, and their potential as human beings away due to misuse of drugs or alcohol.

Always consult with an attorney about any criminal or non-criminal charges you have pending to discuss your options and/or defenses.

I am certified in Field Sobriety and Breath Alcohol Testing, and an active member of the National College of DUI Defense (NCDD). My online materials include over 500 blog posts, dozens of articles, and over 500 informative videos on my youtube channel.

I have co-authored Strategies for Defending DWI Cases in New York, in both 2011 and 2013. These are West Thomson legal manuals on New York State DWI defense, and focus on the best practices for other lawyers handling a New York DWI case. I was selected by Super Lawyers as a Upstate New York 2013 Rising Star in DWI/DUI Defense based on my experience, contributions, and professional standing.

http://www.ithacadwi.com

newman.lawrence@gmail.com

607-229-5184

Reviews of Larry Newman:

http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/14850-ny-lawrence-newman-530905.html

The Price of Success

Everything has a cost. Nothing is ever truly free. I tell people beware of freebies. Beware of the free lunch or the easy anything. Things of "value" have a price. Of course, the word value is the kicker.

So what is it that we value? First and foremost, I think that those that are building a future for themselves value their name and reputation. I guess if you are not planning to venture forward to bigger and better things having a lifetime criminal conviction on your permanent record would not matter. For those that are dreaming of jobs, positions, professions, prospects, and opportunities their life file of pluses and minuses can impact their future choices and their options.

People ask me many of the same questions again and again. The BIG Question in DWI defense: What is the difference between a DWI and DWAI? The main difference, the crucial difference is that one makes you a criminal (a person with a criminal conviction) on their record and one does not. The money and other associated pains, as in the fines, state surcharges, DMV fees, classes, etc. are not that different between the DWs (the driving while...).

If you want to fight the charges. To contest the evidence. To challenge the government. All of that comes with a price. It takes time, money, and effort. In some cases, we need expert witnesses. We need experts to testify about your asthma, your reflux, your diabetes, your medications for allergies, and any other reason why your breath test result (your BAC) was what it was, and not because you were intoxicated. Defenses like these do not come cheap.

Wars are never easy or inexpensive, and trials are wars. The government has the power to charge and prosecute, and the resources to accomplish this. They often exercise this power without discretion. Those that are naive believe that their lifetime of good work, achievement, standing, and clean living will somehow negate the government's intent on pursuing prosecution of crimes.

The prosecutors do not care about any of that. Their focus is always on: can they make out their case against you? Can they make the charges stick? In theory, they are supposed to seek justice but in truth they seek convictions.

New York State DWIs are not commonly (rarely) reduced to non-criminal dispositions. Those with BACs of 0.12 or higher should brace for a bumpy ride. In 2010, refusal (without a breath test) cases are being prosecuted just as seriously.

I am committed to the challenge of DWI defense. I have a wife and four kids and they all pay the price of my learning. Getting to and attending conferences thousands of miles away comes with a large price. Many long weekends spent in airports, planes, hotels, and conference centers takes it's toll on marriage and family life. I believe learning can never and should never end.

This year, I have already been to three Gerry Spence Trial Lawyer College conferences (one in January in California, another in Texas, and another in Washington state). I am about to jump on a plane in the morning for the annual Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers DWI seminar in New Orleans, Louisiana. It is called "Mastering Scientific Evidence" and we will be working with the breath machines. These are not sit in the room and take notes types of get togethers. We have mock DWI trials, we have hands on work with the Datamaster breathalyzers, and we practice skills building exercises. Defending DWI cases demands hard work, diligent focus, and persistent effort to be successful. I invest in success so that when my clients place their trust and faith in me as their attorney it stands on current education and experience.

DWI "Just the facts, ma'am"

I listen to stories about drinking and driving almost every day. I need to know all the details. In my day we had a TV show called Dragnet. The show had a cop named, Joe Friday who loved to say, "All we want are the facts ma'am." I too want the facts but more importantly I want my client's version of the night. I want to understand his perceptions and viewpoint.

This allows me to piece together the timelines, the potential witnesses, behavior patterns, and the amount of alcohol consumed. Ultimately I want to have a more clear picture of the prosecution's case against my client. I also have a software program that allows me to input my client's age, sex, height, weight, and drinking information to arrive at a pretty accurate BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) at the time of driving. Of course it is only a BAC range, and highly dependent upon my client giving me reliable information.

One of the first things that is difficult to estimate is the potency of the drinks. What type of beer or wine was drank? What was it's alcohol concentration? How big were the cocktails or the glasses they came in? Sometimes "one" drink has really 3 or 4 shots of 80 proof liquor. Beer can be 3-5 % and wine can go up to 14 %. Bacardi 151 is 75 % alcohol!

I recently had a client who swore he only had 3. Yeah, as in 3 Long Island Iced Teas! Do you know how much alcohol is in one LI Iced tea? In a good one, there is probably at least 4 shots.

So my client had 12 drinks before he began drinking Lite beer later in the evening. I would imagine smoking a few hits off his buddy's joint didn't help matters.

Remember that proof is twice the percent of alcohol.

5 ounces of wine 24 proof 24 ÷ 2 = 12 (% alcohol) 12 ÷ 100 = 0.12 0.12 x 5 oz = 0.6 ounces ethanol

12 ounces of beer 10 proof 10 ÷ 2 = 5 (% alcohol) 5 ÷ 100 = 0.05 0.05 x 12 oz = 0.6 ounces ethanol

1 1/2 shot 80 proof 80 ÷ 2 = 40 (% alcohol) 40 ÷ 100 = 0.4 0.4 x 1.5 oz = 0.6 ounces ethanol

One drink = .6 ounces of ethanol and usually one drink will cause someone (the average person) to go up .02 to .03 BAC per drink. If you had 4 drinks in a one hour period then your BAC would be .08 to .12. Alcohol dissipates (is expelled, eliminated) at around .015 to .02 per hour. In theory you can drink one drink per hour and clear the alcohol from your body at that rate (in other words remain alcohol free), after the alcohol clears.

So you are at a bar and have two drinks over two hours, you leave the bar, your BAC should be less than .04?

But we do not know the size of the drinks, or your metabolism, how much you weigh, or what you ate? All these factors affect your elimination rate.

Breath tests are not always reliable, accurate, or valid. Often they are not administered properly. People come in all different shapes and sizes. Getting a real BAC is a beginning, and getting the facts of the case from my client takes us one step closer to defeating a DWI.

Out of State Licenses and NYS DWI

As is often the case with students attending Cornell University, Ithaca College, or SUNY Binghamton I have clients with driver's licenses from many different states, and sometimes even different countries. With criminal charges pending, often a DWI, wasting time by waiting for things to improve on their own accord is futile.

There are unique and collateral issues that need to be dealt with early in the majority of situations. For instance, if someone is from New Jersey and holds a NJ license, and now is a student residing in New York State, and if their future plans include staying in NYS for a number of years then why are they maintaining a NJ driver's license? Is it in there best interests, financially and functionally to maintain their NJ driver's license? These issues may not be as pressing until I tell them that because they hold a NJ driver's license their NYS DWI conviction is going to cost them $1000/year for three years ($3,000 in total) in NJ, and then another $250/year for three years in NYS. In addition, NJ will suspend their driving privileges for 210 days (with NO conditional or restricted license privileges).

So waiting to hire a lawyer is not a good idea. In fact hiring a lawyer not conversant in how a DWI/DUI conviction can impact your state's driving privileges is a bad idea.

Any lawyer can do any type of legal matter. BUT will they do a good job is another story. Will they be thorough? Will they understand the collateral consequences? Just today I got an email:

"First and foremost, I'd like to say that ive gotten more information from you on your website than i did from my own lawyer! My question is...."

So my advice:

Always Hire the best Bankruptcy lawyer for your bankruptcy!

Always Hire the best family lawyer for your divorce!

Always Hire the best estate lawyer for your will and trust!

Always Hire the best business lawyer for your incorporation!

Always Hire the best real estate lawyer for your house closing or sale!

Having a generalist lawyer handle your case "may be" like having your family doctor (GP) handle a foot problem (instead of a podiatrist) or

handle a back problem (instead of a Chiropractor or an orthopedic surgeon) or

handle a skin problem (instead of a dermatologist) or

handle a psychological problem (instead of a psychologist)

Don't tell me but he's been practicing for 25, 30, or 35 years so he knows what he's doing. Remember the world is dynamic. The laws are constantly changing, the days of the generalist are over, and staying current and focused is the best strategy for long term success!

The Art of DWI Defense

As the year 2009 comes to an end for me it is a time to reflect upon the past, and prepare for 2010. I have learned a lot this year, and grown as a DWI defense practitioner, and as a person. So as the year comes to a close... what have I learned? Or more true to form ... what have I been forced to remember?

1. You have to fight for what you want. Contesting a DWI comes with a price. Very little of true value, and worth comes easily. This price is not just money. It is time, it is effort, it is emotion, and it comes with making an investment in the outcome.

Whoever is first to the battle will be fresh for the fight. Sun Tzu

2. What happens outside of the Courtroom determines what happens inside the Courtroom. If a DWI trial is a day or two, the prep for that trial is weeks to months. Much like a game of football, level of practice and training determines the game's outcome. Few realize that those magic moments on game day are the result of thousands of hours of mental and physical work.

For me it is all those seminars, certifications in FSTs and Breath Testing, books, and DVDs. It is honing and focusing on one thing to the exclusion of all else.

The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand. Sun Tzu

3. DWI Policies are not set in stone. This year the Pope changed midnight mass to 10:00PM. In the 1960s the Catholic Church changed services from Latin to English. What is true and fixed one minute or moment in time will change tomorrow. Everything is dynamic, nothing is static.

If a District Attorney says, "we have never done it that way," I say, "well maybe now is the time to change." The government has policies, the Church has policies, and many corporations have policies. Rules, written and unwritten, observed and not observed are all subject to change. This year I have shown multiple people that just because you say (or your company states) this is the way it is, or this is the way it has to be, or this is the way we have done it for years, does not mean that is the way it will be, right now in this particular case or situation.

Water shapes its course according to the nature of the ground over which it flows; so in wartime there are no constant conditions. Sun Tzu

4. You have to move to progress. I get calls all the time. Sometimes from people not happy with their current lawyers. Often those lawyers did not file any motions, and did not move cases to suppression hearings in advance of trial. Even though we are in the defense game, you have to play offense as well. DWI cases are special in that waiting and hoping for what I call a Rambo victory by attrition is not a likely scenario. Remember in movie First Blood when Rambo was able to survive out in the wilderness. He was able to withstand the elements (the weather), able to forage and find food, and to create shelter out of garbage. He was able to outlast and outplay his pursuers. In survivor terms it was a battle for victory by attrition.

I have seen and heard of defense lawyers prolonging DWI cases for years in the hopes of getting a deal. Just one conference after another. This is more common with older lawyers. It is a civil strategy as well. The "Wear the Bastards Down" technique. Maybe that game plan will work with a drug case, or maybe that will work with a case involving civilian witnesses to a crime. I do not subscribe to that theory. Move, move hard, move fast, be proactive, and strike points. In other words, build a case defense, have a strategy, and attack the evidence. You cannot attack anything on your back. Make a Full frontal assault at the State's case, put them on the defense.

There has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited.

One defends when his strength is inadequate, he attacks when it is abundant.

Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays. Sun Tzu

DWI Stories

December 22, and it has gotten cold in Ithaca, NY. The winter winds are starting to blow, and thermals are becoming a necessary part of my morning prep. Holiday parties are in full swing, and my phone has been ringing.

I listen to stories. In truth, everything is a story. Is there really an objective reality? Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. If someone believes that is what happened, is it a lie? There are the stories that my clients tell me, and then there are the stories that the police write in their reports. Often my clients tell me, "that never happened! or I don't remember saying that!"

I give my client's a long questionnaire to fill out, and also ask them to supply me with a narrative of the day of their arrest. That will begin to give me the best (most complete) view (story) of the DWI. Combining that story with the police reports, and records puts me in a good position to gauge the potential defenses, strategies, and issues within the case. BUT what happens if my clients DISTORT their memory, and then I am left with a faulty story of the event.

I believe as a DWI defense lawyer that One of the most important stories is my client's way of "seeing" this event.

I am not a psychologist but I love understanding how people think. Psychologists use the term

Cognitive Distortions to describe a person who takes an event, and sees it in unhealthy ways.

1. Absolute thinking (the all or nothing pattern): Seeing your DWI as black or white. Using words like always, never, and every paint you into a corner mentally. DWI cases, and their defenses have degrees of gray, rarely are they in clear cut black or white categories. You are not a total failure because of this DWI.

2. Overgeneralizing: This DWI is not a never ending pattern of bad news or your life's direction.

3. Using Mental Filters in the negative: You pick out everything you did that was wrong, improper, and focus on that to the exclusion of everything else. Are my clients blocking out the truth (the good things they did) at some unconscious level? Are they blocking out their memory of normal, sober, and appropriate behavior patterns?

4. Negate the Positive: You downplay your positive experiences. You put down your ability to follow directions accurately, to follow the officer's directions under pressure, and to walk on a straight imaginary line in the dark at 2:00AM.

5. You Jump to Conclusions and Interpret Negatively: Just because you are not coordinated doesn't mean you were drunk, do you have two left feet?, just because you were speeding doesn't mean you were driving drunk, drunk is a conclusion, intoxicated is a conclusion, impaired is a conclusion, you can look for and see things any way you choose to convincingly support a conclusion. My tie may be red I(a fact), whether it matches my pants or is ugly is a conclusion. Give me the facts, not your conclusions about the facts.

6. Magnifying or Minimizing: Are you exaggerating or minimizing the importance of any part of this event or the event itself? Are you inappropriately making things smaller or larger than they are or need to be? Is this goof up the end of your life? your marriage? your job?

7. Emotionalizing: Are you emotionalizing (feeling it to be) the DWI? I feel it is..... so it is. Things and events are devoid of emotions and feelings, if you choose to attach negative emotions to this event it will reflect back to you as "truth" when in fact it is only a version of the events.

8. Shoulda, woulda, coulda, I must, I have to: These are the words of guilt. This behavior pattern will not help you or your case. Guilt is lopsided, it means imagining more negatives than positives in your past.

9. Mislabeling the event: Describing the DWI by putting a negative label on yourself, as in " I am a loser" or "I am an idiot"

10. Personalizing the DWI: This means "I am a horrible person, I am irresponsible" You are not your DWI case. You are not crime, or a criminal charge.

All these "Distortions" will hinder your getting past this event, and your DWI defense. They cloud your mind, your judgment, and your remembering the event clearly. To be the most help to your attorney you need a clear head.

Dividing and Conquering the DWI

I am a fan of military movies. When I was young I loved to watch John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, and Charles Bronson. They were in my mind men's men. They were walking, talking confident leaders. In my memory, forever type cast as strong, wise, and tough conquerers. They fought for justice, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness.

When I think of my own career arcs, I have always fought or placed myself up against the establishment. When I was a Chiropractor, it was giving my patients the choice of using holistic and natural treatments rather than blindly following one size fits all modern-scientific medical dogma. At other times it was arguing with an insurance company who refused to pay for a procedure or denied benefits. As a lawyer practicing civil law, it was fighting hospitals, medical doctors, and their insurance companies.

Today, practicing DWI defense law, it is the New York State government, law enforcement, and their lawyers (the prosecutors). I am the check to the system. Often I work to set an imbalance. In other words, to create a more level playing field.

One basic premise behind DWI defense is that a case can be won if it is carefully and completely broken down into little pieces. The military theory behind it is called, "Defeat in Detail." You can defeat an enemy more easily by dividing their forces. As Lincoln said, "United we stand, divided we fall." Sun Tzu, said in classic military text, The Art of War, "Fracture the whole."

Any case becomes a story. Every story has chapters. Each chapter has a goal and a purpose. The story is usually of a person at the center of a police investigation.

While they (the government lawyers) are focusing on patterns and signs that focus on drunkenness. I break down the story into the good driving, normal walking, normal talking, normal thinking, normal responding, normal answering, and normal behavior into little bites of tailored information. Each chapter of my story highlights function, and normality. My story focuses on the missing pieces. Their stories embody red, bloodshot, watery eyes, slurred speech, and the strong odor of alcohol. Painting a picture of the fall down drunk. I am looking for all the other reasons (the reasonable doubt) for those same observations.

What is observed are always surface signs. Eyes can look watery at 1:30AM for many reasons, none having to do with the consumption of alcohol. The majority of people are not at their best in the middle of night, and the early morning hours.

So many questions need to be asked. How long have they been studying? How many hours sleep have you had the night before? What is the state of their health? What effect do red and blue flashing lights play in your performance? Or a huge flashlight thrust in your face? Were you nervous, upset, and scared? The term "performance anxiety" ring a bell. How well would anyone do at anything if they forced, under the gun so to speak to perform?

It's all how you look at it. It's the focus. It's the breakdown. It's the details. Make a list right now (while it is still fresh) of everything you did that was good, that was right, that was normal

on the night of your arrest. You will be surprised at how much of what you remember was normal.

New York Passes New Tougher DWI Laws

Yesterday I was first up in Ithaca City Court (first come first served), with four DWI cases in various stages of disposition. Judge Rossiter began the morning by announcing to a full Courtroom (240 cases on her docket) about the new New York DWI legislation that was a coming.

On November 18, 2009, Governor Paterson signed into law, Governor's Program Bill Number 204, The Child Passenger Protection Act, also known as Leandra's Law, it passed by the wide margin of 58-0.

New York State now joins 35 other states that make it a class E felony for first time DWI offenders driving with children as passengers. Class E Felonies carry State prison terms of 1 to 4 years, and 5 years of probation.

This new law also makes Ignition Interlock Devices Mandatory for first time DWI offenders. This is something the Court must impose for a period of at least 6 months. Illinois just put this into their law in 2009, and many other states are following suit.

Specifically under the new law:

1. First time DWI offenders (the per se violation of a BAC .08 or higher and/or common law DWI) or Impaired by drugs (DWAI drugs) driving with a child (15 years or under) may be charged with a Class E Felony. In the past, DWIs were only charged as Class E felonies after a second DWI was committed within a 10 year time period.

2. Mandatory Driver License Suspension (pending prosecution) for people so charged. This is no different than the law in it's current form.

3. Courts MUST order an ignition interlock device on all those convicted of DWI. There is a minimum 6 month time period for Installation and maintenance of the device on any vehicle owned and operated by those convicted of DWI.

4. The Probation Department within each respective county will monitor, issue regulations, and oversee these Ignition Interlock Devices, and their usage. Reading between the lines that means Probation Supervision is a likely possibility ( 3 years for a misdemeanor DWI, and 5 years for a felony DWI) for those convicted as well.

5. Drivers who cause serious physical injury (the threshold for serious injury is not very high) to children 16 or younger will be charged with a Class C Felony, punishable by up to 15 years in State Prison.

6. Drivers who cause the death of child may be charged with a Class B Felony, punishable by up to 25 years in State Prison.

7. Drivers (who are also parent, guardian, or legally responsible for a child) charged with any DWI or DWAI drugs while "that" child is a passenger will also be reported to the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment. Child endangerment charges are another likely scenario as well as being held as an unfit parent or legal guardian.

The good news, this year I have not had any DWI cases where my clients had children 16 years or younger as passengers in their cars. Although I did refer a DWI case with a NY driver traveling through another state who did have his children asleep in the back seat of his car. If that same case played out here, with this new legislation in place, it would be a potential nightmare on so many levels.

In that situation, the Office of Children and Family Services would be involved, and those parents would be facing criminal court and family court, and an open Pandora's box of problems. Charges of Child maltreatment, Child neglect, and Child abuse may add to all the other issues facing first time DWI offenders.

Lawrence Newman, D.C., Esq.

http://www.ithacadwi.com