Beating the Box or Breath Test Issues in a Nutshell

Winter in Ithaca, NY has finally arrived. Today it is 6 degrees with the windchill, yow! What's funny about that is by Ithaca Winter standards that is still fairly warm. I had a friend of mine visit one winter from Greece, and of course the day he came it was well below zero with the wind. He thought we were crazy to live here. He made it about 15 minutes outside before his breathing became labored and he started to look a bit pee kid.

Anyway, "THE" box, the definite article for sure. The box refers of course to the breathalyzer, aka the breath test, aka the Datamaster (the machine preference of City, Village, and Town Police), aka The Chemical test, aka The Alcotest (the machine preferred by NYS Troopers).

The Box provides a fast, easy, and cheap means to test the breath to indirectly compute a BAC (blood alcohol concentration). We can argue all day about: fast, cheap, easy, and indirect testing. The box is Not to be confused with the field breath test, called the alcosensor, done at roadside, and not admissible in NYS for a BAC result but merely to prove the consumption of alcohol.

There are Three main problem areas in Breath Testing:

1. problem with the person: medications, diseases of the lungs, ie. asthma, COPDs, allergies, diabetes, GERD (Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease), is it stomach contents, etc.

2. problem with the machine: out of calibration, simulator/reference solution has bad chemicals (out of date), broken parts, maintenance issues, temperature issues, etc.

3. problem with the operator: did not follow protocols, did not do proper observation prior to testing, used radio, phone, or beeper in room (Radio frequency Interference), did not check mouth for foreign substances, dentures, etc.

Is the BAC machine result reliable? Can the jury rely upon it?

Is the BAC machine result accurate? Is it a real number of the person's BAC?

Another potential issue:

TIMING: Is the machine BAC result (Post driving) a true measure of the BAC at the time of driving?

The idea of arguing that breath testing "in general" is bad, is inaccurate, and is unreliable is usually not the best approach. Juries want to have a "specific" reason or reasons why something like a breath test result in a specific case/situation is not to be trusted.

Beating the BOX then becomes a reality. Because in the end, the jurors should only follow and apply ONE presumption at trial, the POI (presumption of innocence). The government must prove their case, including the BAC result to the BRD standard (Beyond a Reasonable Doubt).

The Price of Success

Everything has a cost. Nothing is ever truly free. I tell people beware of freebies. Beware of the free lunch or the easy anything. Things of "value" have a price. Of course, the word value is the kicker.

So what is it that we value? First and foremost, I think that those that are building a future for themselves value their name and reputation. I guess if you are not planning to venture forward to bigger and better things having a lifetime criminal conviction on your permanent record would not matter. For those that are dreaming of jobs, positions, professions, prospects, and opportunities their life file of pluses and minuses can impact their future choices and their options.

People ask me many of the same questions again and again. The BIG Question in DWI defense: What is the difference between a DWI and DWAI? The main difference, the crucial difference is that one makes you a criminal (a person with a criminal conviction) on their record and one does not. The money and other associated pains, as in the fines, state surcharges, DMV fees, classes, etc. are not that different between the DWs (the driving while...).

If you want to fight the charges. To contest the evidence. To challenge the government. All of that comes with a price. It takes time, money, and effort. In some cases, we need expert witnesses. We need experts to testify about your asthma, your reflux, your diabetes, your medications for allergies, and any other reason why your breath test result (your BAC) was what it was, and not because you were intoxicated. Defenses like these do not come cheap.

Wars are never easy or inexpensive, and trials are wars. The government has the power to charge and prosecute, and the resources to accomplish this. They often exercise this power without discretion. Those that are naive believe that their lifetime of good work, achievement, standing, and clean living will somehow negate the government's intent on pursuing prosecution of crimes.

The prosecutors do not care about any of that. Their focus is always on: can they make out their case against you? Can they make the charges stick? In theory, they are supposed to seek justice but in truth they seek convictions.

New York State DWIs are not commonly (rarely) reduced to non-criminal dispositions. Those with BACs of 0.12 or higher should brace for a bumpy ride. In 2010, refusal (without a breath test) cases are being prosecuted just as seriously.

I am committed to the challenge of DWI defense. I have a wife and four kids and they all pay the price of my learning. Getting to and attending conferences thousands of miles away comes with a large price. Many long weekends spent in airports, planes, hotels, and conference centers takes it's toll on marriage and family life. I believe learning can never and should never end.

This year, I have already been to three Gerry Spence Trial Lawyer College conferences (one in January in California, another in Texas, and another in Washington state). I am about to jump on a plane in the morning for the annual Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers DWI seminar in New Orleans, Louisiana. It is called "Mastering Scientific Evidence" and we will be working with the breath machines. These are not sit in the room and take notes types of get togethers. We have mock DWI trials, we have hands on work with the Datamaster breathalyzers, and we practice skills building exercises. Defending DWI cases demands hard work, diligent focus, and persistent effort to be successful. I invest in success so that when my clients place their trust and faith in me as their attorney it stands on current education and experience.

The New York DWI is a Two Headed Monster

In New York State if someone does (as in takes) the breath test, more accurately known as the "chemical" test back at the station then they will be charged with two counts of DWI.

1. DWI Common Law VTL 1192 (3): The government must prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that you (the operator) were incapable (to a substantial extent) of operating the automobile both mentally and physically as a reasonably prudent driver. This usually is through the stop officer's (the arresting officer) testimony concerning your driving, behavior, appearance, testing, odor, etc. In other words, his "subjective" opinion.

2. DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) A BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) of .08 or higher or Aggravated DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) (a) A BAC of .18 or higher. The government needs to prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the breath test was given within 2 hours of your arrest, was properly administered, by a currently licensed BTO (Breath Test Operator), using properly mixed chemicals, with a calibrated and maintained breath machine. This of course is an indirect measurement of blood alcohol via a breath measurement.

The two most common machines are the Datamaster DMT (used by town, village, and city police depts.) and the Draeger Alcotest (used primarily by the N.Y. State Police). These machines are accepted by the Courts as approved for BAC testing.

There are various ways to attack both the DWI counts but remember that if you took the test it will need to be dealt with and can not be overlooked by your attorney. The per se count becomes the primary target because it is a number that the prosecution will mention again and again.

I believe that a shotgun approach to arguing that all breath testing is inaccurate and unreliable (fraught with error) will usually fall on deaf ears. A focused and detailed strategy is the most effective way to defeat each count.

Depending upon the specific facts of each DWI case arguments can be waged against:

1. Whether the procedures and protocol of breath testing were adhered to?

2. Whether the machines were calibrated in a timely manner?

3. Whether the machine in question had any recent repairs or issues?

4. Whether the chemicals were properly mixed and/or expired (out of date)?

So records need to be examined carefully and potentially subpoenas must be issued against the police to get ALL the machine records. To get police records your attorney is going to need to get Judicial Subpoenas (issued and approved through a Judge). With a lot of work often the ugly truth comes out, and the breath test's validity becomes an issue of doubt.

In recent cases, I found that the State Police had written in the wrong chemical expiration date. The chemicals were expired days before my client's breath test. After I filed my motions the Judge was compelled to throw out the test, and the prosecution's case along with it. In another case the machine had frequent break downs, and parts replaced concerning the same issue, the machine would not accept a breath sample. My client was charged with a refusal because the police said she wasn't trying (blowing) hard enough. That case was also thrown out after I subpoenaed all the machine records, and brought to light the machine's problems.

Nothing of any value is easy, cheap, or speedy. That first case went to multiple hearings and motions. My client was relieved when the nightmare was over but during the process had many uneasy days and nights. To me the DWI is a two headed monster with one head uglier than the other.