Is a New York State DWAI (driving while ability impaired) on my record Forever?

As an attorney who publishes a lot of video, articles, etc I get my share of phone calls, texts, and emails. Put yourself out there, and I do, and you get asked questions. Sometimes I have answers, other times I need to find stuff out, and sometimes I'm SOL, I don't know and noone else does either. Frustrating as all that is I believe that people deserve, yes I said it deserve the truth. In the words of a great movie actor, "you can't handle the truth" is often so true because people want lies. They want to be lied to about outcomes, they want to be lied to about the things that hurt, the things that scare and concern them. Either they want to hide their heads in the sand or they look for some slick lawyer to tell them a bunch of BS. It is normal. It is human nature. What it is not is smart. Smart faces the truth head on. Smart deals with reality. Smart doesn't delude or water down "what is." Smart confronts "what is."

"What is" is that people make mistakes. They make mistakes all the time. This is neither good or bad. It is merely a fact of life.

So to the answer to the original question: A NYS DWAI (VTL 1192 (1)) is going to stay ON your record, the record of your NYS arrest, your NYS file, your NYS fingerprints, your NYS mugshots Forever! that's 4ever for those younger than me. It is only a violation but a violation that lingers. Even those most NYS violations get sealed (records destroyed), this one doesn't. It will be there after 30, 40, 50 years of your life.

Guess what, District Attorneys will bring it up, and seek to use if against you in the future if you get another DW (driving while) even if it is it from 30 or 40 years ago. "They" believe you are merely a drunk driver that hasn't been caught in 30 or 40 years. They will seek out jail, probation, and anything else they think you deserve as a "habitual" offender. They do not believe in live and let live, or redemption, or the passage of time, or that you should be given credit for your stable job, four kids, and paying your taxes over those 30 years. You want fair, you better move to another planet.

DWAI is merely a violation (a traffic violation) with no points but some states and Canada will still view it as a crime. States like Florida don't have a DWAI and see our violation/offense in the same light as their DUI.
Canada will not automatically allow you into their country after a NYS DWAI. They don't have one either, an offense like ability impaired.

My final thoughts:

It (a DWAI/DWI) will NOT prevent you from "being or doing" anything of any magnitude, doctor, lawyer, or congressman


Will some people/future employers see it as horrible and bad? yes, but they might also not like something else about you, legally they cannot use any violation or crime against you for employment but your breath, hair, attitude is all open game lol some people/judges even think "pot" is a bad/gateway drug, is it? everyone will have an opinion, don't they always!
Get "educated" both in and out of school about a great many things, life is a school, a DWAI/DWI is a lesson, ask me about the students I represent with MBAs, and Phds that are facing felonies, talk about hurdles, DWAI/DWI is merely a bump

Learn this:

"YOU" will always decide and direct your future not a mistake you had in judgment on one particular moment in time,

DO NOT ever let this or anything else ever stop you from pursuing your dreams
all the best
 
Larry Newman

Beating the Box or Breath Test Issues in a Nutshell

Winter in Ithaca, NY has finally arrived. Today it is 6 degrees with the windchill, yow! What's funny about that is by Ithaca Winter standards that is still fairly warm. I had a friend of mine visit one winter from Greece, and of course the day he came it was well below zero with the wind. He thought we were crazy to live here. He made it about 15 minutes outside before his breathing became labored and he started to look a bit pee kid.

Anyway, "THE" box, the definite article for sure. The box refers of course to the breathalyzer, aka the breath test, aka the Datamaster (the machine preference of City, Village, and Town Police), aka The Chemical test, aka The Alcotest (the machine preferred by NYS Troopers).

The Box provides a fast, easy, and cheap means to test the breath to indirectly compute a BAC (blood alcohol concentration). We can argue all day about: fast, cheap, easy, and indirect testing. The box is Not to be confused with the field breath test, called the alcosensor, done at roadside, and not admissible in NYS for a BAC result but merely to prove the consumption of alcohol.

There are Three main problem areas in Breath Testing:

1. problem with the person: medications, diseases of the lungs, ie. asthma, COPDs, allergies, diabetes, GERD (Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease), is it stomach contents, etc.

2. problem with the machine: out of calibration, simulator/reference solution has bad chemicals (out of date), broken parts, maintenance issues, temperature issues, etc.

3. problem with the operator: did not follow protocols, did not do proper observation prior to testing, used radio, phone, or beeper in room (Radio frequency Interference), did not check mouth for foreign substances, dentures, etc.

Is the BAC machine result reliable? Can the jury rely upon it?

Is the BAC machine result accurate? Is it a real number of the person's BAC?

Another potential issue:

TIMING: Is the machine BAC result (Post driving) a true measure of the BAC at the time of driving?

The idea of arguing that breath testing "in general" is bad, is inaccurate, and is unreliable is usually not the best approach. Juries want to have a "specific" reason or reasons why something like a breath test result in a specific case/situation is not to be trusted.

Beating the BOX then becomes a reality. Because in the end, the jurors should only follow and apply ONE presumption at trial, the POI (presumption of innocence). The government must prove their case, including the BAC result to the BRD standard (Beyond a Reasonable Doubt).

The New York DWI is a Two Headed Monster

In New York State if someone does (as in takes) the breath test, more accurately known as the "chemical" test back at the station then they will be charged with two counts of DWI.

1. DWI Common Law VTL 1192 (3): The government must prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that you (the operator) were incapable (to a substantial extent) of operating the automobile both mentally and physically as a reasonably prudent driver. This usually is through the stop officer's (the arresting officer) testimony concerning your driving, behavior, appearance, testing, odor, etc. In other words, his "subjective" opinion.

2. DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) A BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) of .08 or higher or Aggravated DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) (a) A BAC of .18 or higher. The government needs to prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the breath test was given within 2 hours of your arrest, was properly administered, by a currently licensed BTO (Breath Test Operator), using properly mixed chemicals, with a calibrated and maintained breath machine. This of course is an indirect measurement of blood alcohol via a breath measurement.

The two most common machines are the Datamaster DMT (used by town, village, and city police depts.) and the Draeger Alcotest (used primarily by the N.Y. State Police). These machines are accepted by the Courts as approved for BAC testing.

There are various ways to attack both the DWI counts but remember that if you took the test it will need to be dealt with and can not be overlooked by your attorney. The per se count becomes the primary target because it is a number that the prosecution will mention again and again.

I believe that a shotgun approach to arguing that all breath testing is inaccurate and unreliable (fraught with error) will usually fall on deaf ears. A focused and detailed strategy is the most effective way to defeat each count.

Depending upon the specific facts of each DWI case arguments can be waged against:

1. Whether the procedures and protocol of breath testing were adhered to?

2. Whether the machines were calibrated in a timely manner?

3. Whether the machine in question had any recent repairs or issues?

4. Whether the chemicals were properly mixed and/or expired (out of date)?

So records need to be examined carefully and potentially subpoenas must be issued against the police to get ALL the machine records. To get police records your attorney is going to need to get Judicial Subpoenas (issued and approved through a Judge). With a lot of work often the ugly truth comes out, and the breath test's validity becomes an issue of doubt.

In recent cases, I found that the State Police had written in the wrong chemical expiration date. The chemicals were expired days before my client's breath test. After I filed my motions the Judge was compelled to throw out the test, and the prosecution's case along with it. In another case the machine had frequent break downs, and parts replaced concerning the same issue, the machine would not accept a breath sample. My client was charged with a refusal because the police said she wasn't trying (blowing) hard enough. That case was also thrown out after I subpoenaed all the machine records, and brought to light the machine's problems.

Nothing of any value is easy, cheap, or speedy. That first case went to multiple hearings and motions. My client was relieved when the nightmare was over but during the process had many uneasy days and nights. To me the DWI is a two headed monster with one head uglier than the other.