The Types of New York DWI Explained

What happens to my driver's license after a New York DWI arrest?

Beating the Box or Breath Test Issues in a Nutshell

Winter in Ithaca, NY has finally arrived. Today it is 6 degrees with the windchill, yow! What's funny about that is by Ithaca Winter standards that is still fairly warm. I had a friend of mine visit one winter from Greece, and of course the day he came it was well below zero with the wind. He thought we were crazy to live here. He made it about 15 minutes outside before his breathing became labored and he started to look a bit pee kid.

Anyway, "THE" box, the definite article for sure. The box refers of course to the breathalyzer, aka the breath test, aka the Datamaster (the machine preference of City, Village, and Town Police), aka The Chemical test, aka The Alcotest (the machine preferred by NYS Troopers).

The Box provides a fast, easy, and cheap means to test the breath to indirectly compute a BAC (blood alcohol concentration). We can argue all day about: fast, cheap, easy, and indirect testing. The box is Not to be confused with the field breath test, called the alcosensor, done at roadside, and not admissible in NYS for a BAC result but merely to prove the consumption of alcohol.

There are Three main problem areas in Breath Testing:

1. problem with the person: medications, diseases of the lungs, ie. asthma, COPDs, allergies, diabetes, GERD (Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease), is it stomach contents, etc.

2. problem with the machine: out of calibration, simulator/reference solution has bad chemicals (out of date), broken parts, maintenance issues, temperature issues, etc.

3. problem with the operator: did not follow protocols, did not do proper observation prior to testing, used radio, phone, or beeper in room (Radio frequency Interference), did not check mouth for foreign substances, dentures, etc.

Is the BAC machine result reliable? Can the jury rely upon it?

Is the BAC machine result accurate? Is it a real number of the person's BAC?

Another potential issue:

TIMING: Is the machine BAC result (Post driving) a true measure of the BAC at the time of driving?

The idea of arguing that breath testing "in general" is bad, is inaccurate, and is unreliable is usually not the best approach. Juries want to have a "specific" reason or reasons why something like a breath test result in a specific case/situation is not to be trusted.

Beating the BOX then becomes a reality. Because in the end, the jurors should only follow and apply ONE presumption at trial, the POI (presumption of innocence). The government must prove their case, including the BAC result to the BRD standard (Beyond a Reasonable Doubt).

12 Good Reasons Not to Represent Yourself for a New York DWI

I love practicing law in an area filled with many colleges and universities. Ithaca, NY has Ithaca College and Cornell University and my practice focuses on DWI defense within 50 square miles of Ithaca. Over the years I have represented many students and professors who attended SUNY Binghamton, SUNY Cortland, University of Buffalo, Keuka College, TC3, New York Chiropractic College, Syracuse University, etc. The Finger Lakes region also draws people from all over the country for college events and games, recreational activities, and conferences.

In my view, higher education and drinking seem to go together like spaghetti and meatballs. Like it or not people like to drink. I enjoy drinking. There is no law against drinking and driving just driving while impaired or intoxicated. College can be stressful because thinking is the hardest work there is. Writing voluminous papers (often expounding on topics no one cares about), reading (usually very dry material), and taking exams (that play with your mind) is not always fun times.

Alcohol is the most common, legal, and socially acceptable drug we have. Some of my best college memories involved sharing a drink with my friends and fraternity brothers. After having been through many years of college between my undergraduate B.S. in Human Biology, my Chiropractic education, and then law school I have seen the use and misuse of drugs and alcohol. Mr. Mackie may say "drugs are baddd," but I do not believe that drugs or alcohol are bad. They have their place, much like everything else.

I have had a lot of very smart clients. Some with Masters degrees, and Phds in very hard subject areas. They are as a group highly intelligent, motivated, able to research, understand, and apply knowledge at a level beyond the average person.

Which brings me to my burning question of the day,

Should these People represent themselves? In other words proceed, "pro se"?

I will start out by stating a clear and unequivocal NO! and then give you my twelve reasons.

1. If you are embroiled in something personally it is impossible to remain objective. Distance gives perspective, balance, and non emotional (clear) judgment.

2. Most even very intelligent people do not understand the legal system. Even relatively simple Burdens of proof between license issues (administrative) and criminal cases are different.

3. Many Attorneys in 2010 have to specialize and focus in particular areas of law.

The attorney that understands and spends years practicing primarily divorce law will not know how to handle even a speeding ticket let alone DWI charges.

4. Different areas of the country, state, county, city have local rules and customs.

How a Judge, Court, or Prosecutor proceeds with a DWI case in one part of the state may differ greatly by how they handle it in another part of the state. A DWI in Manhattan uses a different breath machine, the Intoxilyzer 8000 versus the Datamaster and Draeger Alcotest (State Police) in Upstate New York.

5. There are usually collateral issues (ie. license) that need to be addressed.

Dealing with the DMV and ALJs (Administrative Law Judges) at DMV hearings is another potential aspect of DWI cases that is overlooked by lay people.

6. There are often pragmatic issues that need to be thought through. How is your case going to affect an out of state license? What are the potential penalties and future ramifications to your specific job or profession?

7. If your case requires hearings, motions, and a trial what then? Are you certified in Field Sobriety testing? Are you familiar with the forensic science behind Breath testing? Have you ever cross examined a police officer? Have you ever presented evidence? Have you ever picked a jury?

8. Would you know what to look for after you obtain the police reports, breath test documents, and other discovery? Have you read many of these? Do you understand police procedures and protocols? Would you be able to pick out problems with the processing of your case?

9. Would you know what was missing from police reports and other documents?

What's not there is as important as what is there. Can you read in between the lines?

10. Is it possible for you to look over one case (your own) in a vacuum and have any insight, perspective, and/or place it on the spectrum in comparison to any other cases? Do you have a firm grasp of current DWI case law? Can you pick out the legal issues and research them? Can you spot any potential defenses?

10. Seasoned attorneys even hire attorneys to represent them and their families.

What legal background or training do you possess? Have you had any prior experience representing anyone legally?

12. Do you believe that the Government prosecutor will negotiate with you fairly, in good faith, and the same way as if you were represented by an attorney?

Do you think you are on even ground when talking with the district attorney? Does he know more about your situation than you do?

It is often said that people who represent themselves have a fool for a client, don't be foolish get the best lawyer you can afford.

The One Opinion DWI State

Living in the land of: "Ignorance is Bliss" and "What you don't know won't hurt ya." The problem with attending Forensic Science DUI conferences is that you can no longer be a mushroom in the dark. Choosing to remain silent is difficult. So enough beating around the bush...

New York State just takes one breath sample. It's called "replicate" testing. They (the police) Test one sample twice versus the industry accepted norm of "duplicate" testing whereby they take two separate samples. Many other states do duplicate sampling. Because CSI fans, having two separate and distinct samples (within .02 of each other) assures greater accuracy of the procedures.

Imagine for a moment going to the doctor, and getting a high blood pressure reading on his machine. The doctor makes a hypertensive diagnosis based solely upon the one test, and prescribes medication. How about one better, have a blood test for HIV and you are told it is positive. Sorry no second opinions for you, you just have to live with those results.

Well having a breath machine spit out a number is scary stuff. The machine is an unsworn trial witness. Scarier still is the fact that for the test results to even approach any accuracy the machine operator needs to follow the proper procedures. Couple to that fact that machine breath testing of alcohol ASSUMES: an average body temperature, an average metabolism, an average lung capacity, your body is done absorbing alcohol, and you are healthy we have all the ingredients of an inaccurate test.

An inaccurate test is bad enough but when you only get one opinion (from one test sample) it makes that test critical to your guilt or innocence of DWI "per se" (based on the test). Errors in breath testing generally come from three different areas:

1. Machine errors

2. Operator errors

3. Subject errors

Looking at each of these areas in detail is crucial to mounting an effective DWI defense. Recently, I had a case where the chemicals used in testing were expired prior to doing the test. Technically, the chemicals have a certified expiration date from the NYS Police crime lab but more importantly is that that is a "shelf" life (date) for the chemicals. Once the chemicals are put into use for testing on the machine they can only be used for 60 days ("use" life) from the date of first use. So checking chemical logs (the police must keep weekly logs of the chemicals) against the certified expiration dates is important.

The New York DWI is a Two Headed Monster

In New York State if someone does (as in takes) the breath test, more accurately known as the "chemical" test back at the station then they will be charged with two counts of DWI.

1. DWI Common Law VTL 1192 (3): The government must prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that you (the operator) were incapable (to a substantial extent) of operating the automobile both mentally and physically as a reasonably prudent driver. This usually is through the stop officer's (the arresting officer) testimony concerning your driving, behavior, appearance, testing, odor, etc. In other words, his "subjective" opinion.

2. DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) A BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) of .08 or higher or Aggravated DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) (a) A BAC of .18 or higher. The government needs to prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the breath test was given within 2 hours of your arrest, was properly administered, by a currently licensed BTO (Breath Test Operator), using properly mixed chemicals, with a calibrated and maintained breath machine. This of course is an indirect measurement of blood alcohol via a breath measurement.

The two most common machines are the Datamaster DMT (used by town, village, and city police depts.) and the Draeger Alcotest (used primarily by the N.Y. State Police). These machines are accepted by the Courts as approved for BAC testing.

There are various ways to attack both the DWI counts but remember that if you took the test it will need to be dealt with and can not be overlooked by your attorney. The per se count becomes the primary target because it is a number that the prosecution will mention again and again.

I believe that a shotgun approach to arguing that all breath testing is inaccurate and unreliable (fraught with error) will usually fall on deaf ears. A focused and detailed strategy is the most effective way to defeat each count.

Depending upon the specific facts of each DWI case arguments can be waged against:

1. Whether the procedures and protocol of breath testing were adhered to?

2. Whether the machines were calibrated in a timely manner?

3. Whether the machine in question had any recent repairs or issues?

4. Whether the chemicals were properly mixed and/or expired (out of date)?

So records need to be examined carefully and potentially subpoenas must be issued against the police to get ALL the machine records. To get police records your attorney is going to need to get Judicial Subpoenas (issued and approved through a Judge). With a lot of work often the ugly truth comes out, and the breath test's validity becomes an issue of doubt.

In recent cases, I found that the State Police had written in the wrong chemical expiration date. The chemicals were expired days before my client's breath test. After I filed my motions the Judge was compelled to throw out the test, and the prosecution's case along with it. In another case the machine had frequent break downs, and parts replaced concerning the same issue, the machine would not accept a breath sample. My client was charged with a refusal because the police said she wasn't trying (blowing) hard enough. That case was also thrown out after I subpoenaed all the machine records, and brought to light the machine's problems.

Nothing of any value is easy, cheap, or speedy. That first case went to multiple hearings and motions. My client was relieved when the nightmare was over but during the process had many uneasy days and nights. To me the DWI is a two headed monster with one head uglier than the other.

Defeating A DWI

I love to surf, the internet that is. Just yesterday I punched in the above terms "defeating a dwi" and what pops up number one but an article by me. At first I was excited, a google number one, then my expression changed as I saw that my name was left off, and admin was put on as the author.

This was a website for a chemical that eliminates odor from your breath. It was being marketed to drinkers who wish to avoid detection as in if you are ever stopped for a traffic infraction just a quick spray and the cops will go away. As I delved further I found more articles sans name. My anger at this internet piracy grew. The articles mentioned the death of my father the day after my 17th birthday, the name of one of my friends, and other personal information. Everything was there except credit to moi! I'm just a little Upstate New York DWI defense lawyer but I do have feelings. Ithaca inspires me to write and share so it is with joy that I create but give a guy credit.

Their site and my articles sans my name and info.

www.sobriety-checkpoint.net

http://www.sobriety-checkpoint.net/category/dwi-sobriety-checkpoints/

http://www.sobriety-checkpoint.net/tag/case/

My original articles:

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/defeating-the-new-york-dwi-refusal-case-1330173.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/the-power-of-words-in-dwi-case-1335602.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/what-do-sex-and-intoxication-have-in-common-1330200.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/defeating-a-new-york-dwi-by-beginning-with-the-end-in-mind-1335399.html

So on that note I wish to highlight the power of "honesty" in defeating a DWI. Some may think me mad in advocating for truthfulness and openness with a criminal case but I have found that not trying to cover up your fears is a better philosophy and strategy for long term success.

Jurors are not stupid. They have the same doubts and concerns as the lawyer looking at the case. If you do not allay their questions openly they will most assuredly be discussing them back in the Jury room.

We as DWI defense lawyers can not look to sweep dirt under rugs and pray that it is never discovered. Everything can be seen from different perspectives. The key with good advocacy is to put yourself in everyone's shoes. Put yourself in the shoes of the juror, put yourself in the shoes of the cop, put yourself in the shoes of the prosecutor, and put your self in the shoes of the judge. Now the case can be seen as a total whole and not a bunch of random pieces or events.

The facts of any DWI case are nothing without context. Someone has to have a viewpoint of that fact.

This is from an actual case. Fact, a driver was pulled over for having headlights that were too bright. The officer in his report made no mention of investigating or asking about the headlights. The motorist only traffic violation was the headlights but no detail or documentation of this fact, just a single ticket plus of course the DWI investigation and subsequent criminal charges.

I demanded a suppression hearing on the stop (was there reasonable suspicion), and the arrest (was there probable cause). My plan of attack was a whole line of questioning, first on the importance of the report and it's detail, then on the fact that my client showed him the dashboard, demonstrated the lights on and lights off controls. The "stop officer" had one goal for this stop (investigate the bright lights) and this sole purpose was never addressed by his investigation/inquiry.

All the DWI criminal charges were dropped. This was with a .15BAC. The outcome was a DWAI (traffic violation) pre-trial. My thoughts for this case were always that jurors would want to know, the judge would want to know THE BIG WHY? If you say the stop was for x why are you not checking x, asking about x, and investigating x?

I was able to listen to my client and get "the story" of this DWI case. His story included the lights where the officer's did not.

btw that Company in California that "borrowed" my content without giving me credit:

Pure One International

3400 West Warner Ave., Unit A

Santa Ana, CA 92704

714-641-1430

fax 714-641-1432

Bytes for All (Website creation/hosting) from someplace overseas.

I really do believe what comes around goes around so God bless them and may they reap the fruits of the seeds they sow.

Lawrence Newman, Esquire

607-229-5184

Ithaca, NY

What is DWI "Per Se"?

One of the more challenging things about practicing DWI law is communicating the legal statutes in a way that is clear and understandable to my clients. All 50 states have at least two main types of DWI/DUI offenses. One is called a common law DWI, this is what most people understand or interpret as the "driving while drunk" or "driving while impaired" or "driving under the influence." It has many legal definitions, but in NYS it is mental and physical incapacity to operate (drive) a vehicle as a reasonably prudent (safe, responsible) person.

The other NYS statute is our DWI "per se." PER SE: latin for "by, through, in and of itself, intrinsically, inherently, requiring no external evidence."

If you get one thing from this blog this is it:

You DO NOT have to show the signs or symptoms of intoxication or drunkenness or impairment to be found guilty of this offense.

Merely the fact that a "good" (accurate, reliable, properly administered, calibrated) breath test indicated a BAC (blood alcohol concentration) of .08 or more. Some people like to argue but "I wasn't drunk." It does not matter. But I drove perfectly, it does not matter. But I understood the police officer and did all the tests right, it does not matter. If the state (the government/the prosecutor) can bring in their BTO (breath test operator) and make out (prove):

1. he or she was licensed

2. the machine was properly working

3. the test was properly administered

4. the test was performed within two hours of arrest

then ... the jury may (or may not) find that you are guilty of DWI "per se."

Now a DWI defense attorney can argue the problems with taking indirect measurements of blood through the taking of breath. He can argue that everyone is different even though these machines are calculated and calibrated and set up to test and assess "average" people. He can argue that you, the individual on this given occasion had specific medical issues. He can argue that the test was not properly administered, ie. No 20 minute "observation" period.

I have previously discussed other defenses to breath test results that do not match "sober" behavior patterns. In addition, everything the state proves must be proven to the BRD standard (beyond a reasonable doubt).

I could go on and on, suffice to say, the "science" behind breath testing for alcohol leaves a lot to be desired. Prosecutors and many Judges love to rely upon breath test numbers as godspell. After going through the certification program, and studying these machines I am more than a skeptic concerning their accuracy and reliability. I do not trust breath tests!

What does Your DWI Lawyer Believe?

I have just turned the magic age of 48. Getting a bit more grey, having a few more excuse me "sirs" thrown my way pauses me to think, to reflect, and to question.

I feel extremely fortunate for my time here, my practice, and my opportunities. I have had 23 years of practicing both as a Chiropractic Physician, and as an Attorney at Law. Along the way I have had the pleasure and pain of helping thousands of people get through some of the worst times in their lives. I am at heart a caretaker. I am good at helping people heal. Whether with a word or a touch, it is my gift and ability.

I love to learn. What I have returned to again and again is that a person's beliefs will truly control and direct their destiny. At it's core, belief systems can be a series of convictions. Things that people are convinced about. They will fight to maintain them, and to honor their truth.

How many things do we believe in that are "true"? Only later to discover are false. They are propaganda, they are the ideas of others that we have bought into.

I caution those that pick counselors, choose leaders, and hire advisors to first find out what those people BELIEVE.

What does your doctor believe? Does he believe in the miracle of life and love? Does he believe that everything he was taught was fatal, actually is? Does he believe that the mind can affect the body? Does he believe that natural cures and remedies could work? Does he believe that everyone fits in the same box and should receive the same medicine? Does he buy into the value of rest, fresh air, and exercise? My father's doctors all smoked, and were overweight. They cautioned me about doing too much exercise. My father died of a third heart attack at the young age of 51. All his "trusted" doctors, his health advisors died early just like he did.

Now think about this for a moment, this is your doctor, and he is going to advise you, he is going to recommend treatment, he may even render a surgical opinion, how important is his belief system to the ultimate outcome of your care? It is everything! How he feels about drugs, food, surgery, and all else will color his advice to you.

Now take that understanding and perspective to the attorney that is going to represent you.

What does your DWI Defense attorney believe? Does he believe that the breath test is a very accurate, reliable, scientific, and valid measure of blood alcohol concentration? Does he believe that field sobriety tests are fair? Does he believe that the police officer's opinion, and his report are the truth?

I have met many attorneys whose belief systems are defeatist. They are sunk before they even begin. Where can you possibly go if you BUY into the prosecutor's machine result? What can you possibly argue with any heart or passion if you believe that your client is guilty as charged?

The reason why the best (I use that term with caution) DWI defense attorneys go to seminars (on the breath machines and field sobriety tests) is not only to gather knowledge BUT more importantly to topple belief systems. To challenge the reliability, accuracy, and validity of "objective" evidence. To change their minds about possible versus probable. To discover and uncover the natural and persistent doubt that goes with a great defense of the government's proof.

In my opinion the best DWI defense lawyers are SKEPTICS. They want to be shown, they are doubters, they are devil's advocates, they are in a word "difficult" and hard to convince.

What your lawyer and your doctor believe is very important to you and your future.

This is what I believe:

1. Machines are not perfect. They make mistakes. Even when they work perfectly they are subject to error. Often the people that use them use them incorrectly. Breath testing is convenient and cheap, it is not scientific, accurate, or reliable in it's current form.

2. All DWI cases must be looked at in detail, and the evidence must be gathered so that the situation can be looked at in the TOTALITY. How I feel about a case or advise a client will turn upon a full, fair, and realistic evaluation of everything.

3. Opinions are just that. A viewpoint, and a perspective, that have a bias, and that are highly subjective.

4. Lawyers need to understand what is important to their clients. My job is to guide, advise, and represent "their" interests being mindful of "their" values.

5. What people want, and what they can have may be world's apart. While lawyers can predict outcomes, we certainly cannot guarantee them. Many things are outside of our control. Judges, juries, and facts beyond change (accidents, prior convictions, chronologies, etc.) can impact final outcomes. When it comes to legal matters, You may want the cheerfulness of an optimist and hate the opinion of the pessimist, but what you really want is the advice of a realist.

Always ask your doctors, and your lawyers what they "believe" before you hire them to help you.